Wrangular Momentum @AngularMoments

Wow, @bgmasters — care to clarify which group you think should be driven from the federal government first? The women, the Blacks, or the gays?

Blake Masters @bgmasters

3 years ago

Wow, @bgmasters — care to clarify which group you think should be driven from the federal government first? The women, the Blacks, or the gays?

1K 2K 11K 0 175

Mandlfans... follow this thread...

DoctorNeutrino @NeutrinoDoctor

3 years ago

Mandlfans... follow this thread...

1 0 0 0 1

Since I'm taking a break from interacting directly, I'll post this exercise. The point is to demonstrate something simple. If you want to set aside the assumptions made in novice exercises and problems, it's possible to do so. Here we estimate the effect of one idealization:

I'm writing new "course guides" for my classes (which are kind of like syllabi on steroids) and I think that my long talks with JM have convinced me to include a short essay on the "Consider a massless spherical cow..." joke for all of my students to read

Maybe I'll just tweet little snippets of physics wisdom that interacting with JM has made me ponder.

Well, what the hell am I supposed to do with this account NOW??

@WrangularMoment @GPeepo @silent_obs1 @shockmemester @AlCabbage045 @MV10297421 @azforeman @LinguisticsShi1 @dr_friction Stupid childish straw man argument. You are now directly intentionally harassing me. Is that professional?

@MaytheforcebeM @WrangularMoment @MV10297421 @silent_obs1 @shockmemester @GPeepo @AlCabbage045 @azforeman @LinguisticsShi1 @dr_friction Stop harassing me. It is not a reasonable response to being defeated. Face the fact that 12000 rpm falsifies COAM.

John just chooses a canned response halfway through reading a tweet, that's all.

@WrangularMoment @silent_obs1 @MV10297421 @AlCabbage045 @azforeman @LinguisticsShi1 @dr_friction No, I am presenting the existing physics example which has never been considered "lossy and open" and unrepresentative of the law of COAM and is still in use today. You are being dishonest. Is lying good physics?

Any fellow physicists who are interested in helping me do a lit review about student misconceptions regarding approximations and idealizations, contact me at @doctordave or u/DoctorGluino on reddit

@silent_obs1 @WrangularMoment @xicad1 @azforeman @dr_friction I have evaluated the existing physics equations ant they come to 12000 rpm and you are a liar.

Any followers of this account interested in the real me, head over to @doctordave

@WrangularMoment @silent_obs1 @dr_friction Rebuttal 22: researchgate.net/publication/35…

@WrangularMoment @dr_friction @silent_obs1 For a professional unbiased account of the amount of torque in a ball on a string demonstration, please see example 4 at about 27:30 where he explains very clearly that there is "no torque" and "we have an example of conservation of angular momentum. Stop #shiftingthegoalposts.

@dr_friction @WrangularMoment @silent_obs1 Please stop asking me irrelevant questions? Either show me a derivation of the product rule for the cross product that does not neglect the angle, or accept that I have prove all of the derivations wrong.

@WrangularMoment @dr_friction @silent_obs1 At all?