@TheDisproof 15/ Wielicki will dismiss anything from well-referenced blog articles by scientists, yet expects everyone to believe his often unreferenced "expert opinions" on his own blog. He has ZERO expertise in climate change. It's not his field. He has ZERO published papers on the subject
@TheDisproof 16/ Wielicki claims his own blog memes are from the EM-DAT report. They are not. His memes misrepresent the EM-DAT data Link to the EM-DAT report: cred.be/sites/default/…
@TheDisproof 17/ Wielicki refutes himself when he misrepresents EM-DAT data with posting memes starting in 1920, then in the same thread says "anyone posting data with pre-2000 numbers is just selling propaganda." @TheDisproof had refuted many of his memes: x.com/TheDisproof/st…
@TheDisproof 17/ Wielicki refutes himself when he misrepresents EM-DAT data with posting memes starting in 1920, then in the same thread says "anyone posting data with pre-2000 numbers is just selling propaganda." @TheDisproof had refuted many of his memes: x.com/TheDisproof/st… https://t.co/nilSJSGOuG
@TheDisproof 18/ Wielicki posted an old NASA article about CO2 greening the earth, but like every other AGW "skeptic" who posts it, he didn't actually read the article or mention the adverse effects: nasa.gov/technology/car…
@TheDisproof 19/ More recent research shows the "greening" has turned to "browning" eg agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20… science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… scientificamerican.com/article/earth-…
@TheDisproof 20/ When Wielicki DOES post a link to published paper (rarely), he often misrepresents it: eg He lied that this paper shows "the climate is just not that sensitive to CO2". The paper says the CESM1 model is the most accurate with an ECS of 4.2C ! par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/…
@TheDisproof 21/ Wielicki posted a flawed paper Alimonti et al 2022 (none of them are climate scientists). It was retracted as the conclusions of the article were not supported by evidence/data provided by the authors. link.springer.com/article/10.114…
@TheDisproof 22/ Wielicki claims to offer his "expert opinion" on climate change but showed he doesn't even understand the difference between changes in GLOBAL average temperature and changes in LOCAL daily temperature.
@TheDisproof 23/ Wielicki seems unaware of the recent published global temperature literature. eg Osman et al 2021 nature.com/articles/s4158… Marcott & Shakun 2021 nature.com/articles/d4158…
@TheDisproof 24/Wielicki contradicts himself about "global average temperature" First he says it's "a completely meaningless and unscientific metric made up by climate alarmists" Then he talks about "global average temperature" when it suits his narrative. eg (The low outlier UAH TLT)
@TheDisproof 25/ Wielicki posts 3 non-existent “papers” & “quotes” generated by ChatGPT. Deletes his post after being challenged by grad student @brandondaly2018 to provide links. Hides Brandon’s screenshots of the post. Then blocks him & everyone who reposts it.
@TheDisproof @brandondaly2018 26/ When two of the fictitious "papers" & "quotes" that Wielicki posted were confirmed as fake by the supposed authors, Matthew finally had to admit that he had used ChatGPT & hadn't checked their validity. He tried to play victim claiming he was being "silenced" 🙄