Watch: Morano on TNT breaks down Mann v. Steyn climate trial of the century – Details Mann’s false claim to be a Nobel Prize winner @MarkSteynOnline @PhelimMcAleer @annmcelhinney climatedepot.com/2024/02/03/wat…
Note: Actor recreated courtroom testimony courtesy of: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cli…
Flashback 2012: Mann v. Morano: Climategate’s Michael Mann debates Climate Depot’s Morano on Live BBC Radio: Mann: ‘Morano’s a hired assassin’ — Morano: ‘Mann plays the part of martyr very well’ climatedepot.com/2012/12/03/man…
Chapter excerpt Michael Mann’s Hockey Schtick: From best-selling The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change by Marc Morano – Climate Depot @MarkSteynOnline climatedepot.com/2024/02/03/cha…
One of Mann’s colleagues had emailed about “Mike’s Nature trick” to “hide the decline” in his temperature chart. “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline,” Phil Jones, then director of Climatic Research Unit at University of East Anglia wrote in a 1999 email. ... After about 1961 the tree ring data showed a decline in temperatures, contrary to the actual thermometer data, which showed an increase in temperatures. Switching from the proxy tree-ring data to the actual temperatures were Mann’s “trick” to “hide the decline.” “Any scientist ought to know that you just can’t mix and match proxy and actual data,” said Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies. “They’re apples and oranges. Yet that’s exactly what he did.”
More on Michael Mann's shenanigans - Chapter excerpt on Climategate: The UN IPCC Exposed from best-selling The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change by Marc Morano climatedepot.com/2019/11/18/don…
UN IPCC scientist Eduardo Zorita, for example, publicly declared that his colleagues Michael Mann and Phil Jones, who had both been implicated in Climategate, “should be barred from the IPCC process…. They are not credible anymore.” Zorita also noted how petty and punitive the global warming science had become: “By writing these lines I will just probably achieve that a few of my future studies will, again, not see the light of publication.”
Geologist Robert Giegengack of the University of Pennsylvania detailed his initial reaction to the Mann’s hockey stick graph: “I didn’t like it when I first saw it. And when I saw that occur, two things occurred to me. One—I missed the medieval warm phase, which was very, very well documented. And most people who look at the medieval warm phase think that the temperature was higher than it is now. And the second thing I saw was a kink in his curve, and the kink exactly coincided with the change in the way the measurements were made.” Giegengack’s criticism of Mann’s methodology was scathing. “He’s not combining apples and oranges; he is combining apples and elephants and joining them on the same plot,” Giegengack explained. “Where is the medieval warm phase? It has been detected in glaciers now in New Zealand. The medieval warm phase was real.”
The Science and Public Policy Institute reported in 2009, “More than 700 scientists from 400 institutions in 40 countries have contributed peer-reviewed papers providing evidence that the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was real, global, and warmer than the present. And the numbers grow larger daily.”