Hot take: Bitcoin didn’t “fail to scale.” People did. Big blocks, tiny fees, billions of users. Let’s ship. Name one real downside to bigger blocks? #Bitcoin #ScalingBitcoin #BigBlocks #OnChain

@DevelopingZack Even 1 million tx/second capacity is not enough for a victory. To truly succeed Bitcoin has to overcome the people problem.

@DevelopingZack Big blocks make you super unpopular?

@DevelopingZack People keep acting like scaling is optional. It’s not. Either Bitcoin scales or it fades into irrelevance.

@DevelopingZack Nothing failed. Big blockers get BCH, BSV, etc. to make their blocks as unwieldy and bloated as they want.

@DevelopingZack Where’s the TPS signal? Where’s the users?

@DevelopingZack The main downside to bigger blocks is centralization risk, larger blocks increase storage & bandwidth requirements, making it harder for individuals to run full nodes.

@DevelopingZack @jack

@DevelopingZack People have been duped into thinking bitcoin was supposed to make them rich, not free. 🤦‍♀️

@DevelopingZack Aggregated hierarchy of blocks?

@DevelopingZack You are clueless aren’t you NPC.

@DevelopingZack all i know bitcoin was slow and fee was 20 dollar last time i used it. i will never go back to that trashcoin.

@DevelopingZack Oferta adelantada a la demanda.