Pecker: "I was the person who thought that a lot of women would come out to try to sell their stories because Mr. Trump was well known as the most eligible bachelor. And dated the most beautiful women. And it was clear that based on my past experience that when someone was running for public office like this, it is very common for these women to call up magazine like the National Enquirer to try to sell their stories.”
Pecker: "Yes, when i say mutually beneficial, writing positive stories about Trump and covering the election and writing negative stories about his opponents will only help newsstand sales so to me that was my incentive, it was also going to benefit his campaign and both parties benefited from it."
Prior to that 2015 meeting, Pecker had NEVER purchased a story about Trump in order NOT to run it.
This part of the arrangement was NOT mutually beneficial, per Pecker.
@KatiePhang Vote Shirt available here 💙💙⚖️⚖️ anyimage.io//djucu3of
@KatiePhang You Can buy it here 🔥 ✨ viralstyle.com/c/OK9Ae5
@KatiePhang Yo I’ve never ordered something so fast in my life ❤️ viralstyle.com/c/paYPRb
@KatiePhang That doesn’t mean that Trump hadn’t paid other extortion payments to other people.
@KatiePhang I'm not sure that this is correct. Pecker might have a lot that nobody knows about but Trump.