Hello sir: I phoned my agents immediately after seeing this and reiterated my desire to make this a priority. My understanding is that we're working out timing and venues. It's a complex thing to arrange publicly with my a priori tour commitments but there are few conversations I more want to have (@elonmusk, arguably; @realDonaldTrump). We'll make it happen. We have a complex problem to address: can the civilization you and I both admire possibly be sustained without the magic of its underlying metaphysic? You believe so. I'm afraid not. I'm not sure, however, what to make of that suspicion, being as leery (perhaps even more) as you about the danger of ill-formed but hypothetically convenient preconceptions. I've seen the effect of delusion first-hand in my clinical practice. Perhaps we are more allied than not. There's much about which we apparently profoundly agree. You obviously don't want what we have to disappear. I also know you're unhappy about the current state of the universities. You can see, as can I, that the scientific enterprise itself is now on shaky grounds--and not because of the Christians (even the fundamentalists). But we've come to apparently opposite conclusions about the religious enterprise (excepting your appreciation for cultural Christianity). So let's sort this out. I don't want to "win." I want to talk. Hopefully we'll both be in good form when we meet. Good day to you.
Hello sir: I phoned my agents immediately after seeing this and reiterated my desire to make this a priority. My understanding is that we're working out timing and venues. It's a complex thing to arrange publicly with my a priori tour commitments but there are few conversations I more want to have (@elonmusk, arguably; @realDonaldTrump). We'll make it happen. We have a complex problem to address: can the civilization you and I both admire possibly be sustained without the magic of its underlying metaphysic? You believe so. I'm afraid not. I'm not sure, however, what to make of that suspicion, being as leery (perhaps even more) as you about the danger of ill-formed but hypothetically convenient preconceptions. I've seen the effect of delusion first-hand in my clinical practice. Perhaps we are more allied than not. There's much about which we apparently profoundly agree. You obviously don't want what we have to disappear. I also know you're unhappy about the current state of the universities. You can see, as can I, that the scientific enterprise itself is now on shaky grounds--and not because of the Christians (even the fundamentalists). But we've come to apparently opposite conclusions about the religious enterprise (excepting your appreciation for cultural Christianity). So let's sort this out. I don't want to "win." I want to talk. Hopefully we'll both be in good form when we meet. Good day to you.
@KonstantinKisin @jordanbpeterson I'll buy @oliviawilde a ticket
@KonstantinKisin @jordanbpeterson Honestly I can’t think of anything more boring than listening to one guy talking in riddles whilst another deciphers and responds with logic. It would be too painful.
@KonstantinKisin @jordanbpeterson Broadly, JBP seems to be suggesting an Arena/Arenic model of the “God” phenomena, while RD appears to come at it with the Agent/Agentic model (See: @PaulVanderKlay)?