This is silly. Repealing the 19th is not equivalent to telling women to shut up & have no voice in the public square. Repealing the 19th would be a restoration of household voting--strengthening families & encouraging men to be strong leaders by being the "representatives" for their families in the voting booth. Furthermore, ALL of the evidence has shown that we are better off when men lead society. Zero leftwing lunacy we see happening today would have become mainstream had it not been for women given political leadership. That is not something to just gloss over because "mIsOgYnY." Women in political leadership leads to chaos everytime. This is not because women are terrible, it's just because that is not our role. Our instincts aren't as good as men's are politically. Just like their instincts with babies & homemaking aren't as good as ours are. Simple as. We're trying to fill a role that is fundamentally not ours to fill, and consequences are bound to come from that.
This is silly. Repealing the 19th is not equivalent to telling women to shut up & have no voice in the public square. Repealing the 19th would be a restoration of household voting--strengthening families & encouraging men to be strong leaders by being the "representatives" for their families in the voting booth. Furthermore, ALL of the evidence has shown that we are better off when men lead society. Zero leftwing lunacy we see happening today would have become mainstream had it not been for women given political leadership. That is not something to just gloss over because "mIsOgYnY." Women in political leadership leads to chaos everytime. This is not because women are terrible, it's just because that is not our role. Our instincts aren't as good as men's are politically. Just like their instincts with babies & homemaking aren't as good as ours are. Simple as. We're trying to fill a role that is fundamentally not ours to fill, and consequences are bound to come from that.
I see I’ve upset the feminists. lol 😂 hey yall!
@LizzieMarbach I don't need my husband to represent me. I am capable of representing myself. He is more than welcome to use his vote to vote the way he wants and I have the right to vote the way I want and if it's the same that is wonderful. If it's not that is fine as well.
@LizzieMarbach “restoration of household voting” Well, except for households without a man, right?
This is an interesting take but I think it comingles responsibility and accountability. The man was "responsible" for the vote, but the family was accountable to the outcome of that vote. And that IS a good thing. It forces men to consider women's issues and women to consider men's issues when you have to collaborate on a vote that represents your household. If you pay taxes and are eligible for military service (or whatever you think should qualify someone to vote) you should have a vote, but how that vote is represented does represent an interesting hypothesis
@LizzieMarbach You've gained a follow from me! This was so perfectly explained.
@LizzieMarbach You're making her point so perfectly.....
@LizzieMarbach This is literally the only non-violent way to save the west. Simple. firstthings.com/web-exclusives…
@LizzieMarbach Do you have historical evidence to back up this claim? I think Queen Elizabeth did a pretty great job against the Spanish Empire, personally.