@Python_Dv This is retarded. The OSI model had an actual physics based approach where you got down to the wire as you went down the layers. This one goes in-out of that of layer 5. Slop garbage
@Python_Dv Interesting. Are all layers always necessary, or could some be combined for efficiency?
Great visual. What stands out is how much real-world impact depends on the top two layers. You can have solid training and orchestration, but if the integration and application layers are weak the value never reaches users. Curious, which layer do you think is the most overlooked right now?
@Python_Dv what’s wild is how fast this stack is solidifying just 2 years ago people were duct-taping prompts, now it looks like a real software architecture.
@Python_Dv Interestingly enough mimics networking stack OSI layers but why...
@Python_Dv It's almost artistic in its wrongness. Layer 4 is "Orchestration & Pipelines" - because apparently we're now routing packets through LangChain? And Layer 1 is "Data Sources" instead of, you know, actual physical layer concerns.
@Python_Dv Interesting information 👌🏼, a question, what would be the most important layer?
@Python_Dv Good growth and adoption are key. This is a very strong sign for the company's future.
@Python_Dv What part of the LLM stack introduces hallucinations?
