Let’s dive into INF++ and its 10% transfer fee structure, along with how it plays out with $300k in liquidity and a $500k fully diluted valuation (FDV). The query gives us the breakdown: 49% of the fee is redistributed to current holders, 24% is burned, and 24% is half sold for SOL and then added to the liquidity pool (LP). Here’s what this means and how it shapes the token’s ecosystem. Breaking Down the 10% Fee Every time INF++ is bought or sold, a 10% fee is applied to the transaction. This fee is split three ways: 49% Redistributed to Current Holders: This portion goes straight back to everyone already holding INF++, proportional to their share of the total supply. It’s like a reward for sticking around—passive income without needing to do anything extra. 24% Burned: This chunk is permanently removed from circulation, reducing the total supply of INF++ over time. Less supply can mean more scarcity, which might push the price up if demand holds or grows. 24% Half Sold for SOL and Added to LP: Here, 12% of the fee (half of the 24%) is sold for SOL, and then both that SOL and the remaining 12% of INF++ are added to the liquidity pool. This deepens the pool, making trading smoother and more stable. Quick math check: 49% + 24% + 24% = 97%. It’s likely the split is slightly adjusted (e.g., 49%, 25.5%, 25.5%) to hit exactly 10%, but the query says 49%, 24%, 24%, so we’ll roll with that as “close enough” for now. What This Means for Holders The redistribution is the big draw if you’re holding INF++. Imagine a daily trading volume of $10,000: Total fee: $1,000 (10%). Redistributed: $490 (49% of $1,000). If you hold 1% of the supply, you get 1% of $490 = $4.90 that day. It’s not a fortune, but it scales with volume and your stake. Over weeks or months, this can add up, encouraging you to hold rather than sell. It’s a loyalty perk, creating a community vibe where holders benefit from every trade. The 24% burn adds a deflationary twist. With each transaction, the total supply shrinks. At a $500k FDV, the burn’s impact might feel small now, but as trades pile up, it could make your tokens more valuable down the line—assuming demand doesn’t tank. The LP boost (24% of the fee) helps stabilize the token. With $300k in liquidity, INF++ isn’t massive yet, but every trade adds a bit more depth. This reduces slippage and volatility, making it more appealing to serious traders or investors who hate wild price swings. The Catch for Traders If you’re looking to flip INF++ quickly, this 10% fee is a buzzkill. Here’s why: Buy: Spend $1,000, pay $100 fee, get $900 worth of tokens. Sell: Sell that $900 worth, pay another 10% ($90), and walk away with $810. Net loss: -$190 unless the price rises enough to offset it. To break even, the price needs to jump by over 20% (closer to 23.46% when you factor in the math precisely). That’s a high bar for a quick trade, especially in a small-cap token like this. It’s a clear signal: INF++ isn’t built for day traders or short-term speculators. Who Loves This Setup? This fee structure targets specific types of investors: Yield Seekers: The 49% redistribution is passive income—perfect for those who want rewards without active effort. Long-Term Believers: The 24% burn fuels the “scarcity = value” mindset, appealing to folks betting on future growth. Stability Fans: The LP addition (24%) makes the token less chaotic, drawing in those who value a smoother ride. Who Hates It? On the flip side, it’s a tough sell for: Day Traders: That 20% round-trip cost kills quick profits. Short-Term Speculators: You need a massive pump to make it worth your while. Risk-Averse Newbies: The fees and mechanics might feel too complex or punishing. The Big Picture at $300k Liquidity and $500k FDV INF++ is still small. With $300k in liquidity, it’s got room to grow, and the $500k FDV suggests a modest market cap. The fee effects—redistribution, burns, LP growth—won’t feel earth-shattering yet, but they’re designed to compound. If trading volume climbs (say, to $100k daily), you’d see: $4,900 redistributed to holders. $2,400 burned. $2,400 boosting the LP. Over time, this could build a loyal holder base, shrink supply, and stabilize trading. It’s a slow-burn strategy, banking on community growth and adoption rather than hype-driven pumps. The Takeaway INF++’s 10% fee—49% to holders, 24% burned, 24% to LP via SOL—is a deliberate play to reward long-term holding and punish flipping. At $300k liquidity and $500k FDV, it’s early days, but the mechanics are set to encourage a tight-knit community of yield seekers and believers in the project’s future. If you’re in for the long haul, it’s intriguing. If you’re chasing fast gains, look elsewhere.
@STACCoverflow the thing that separates us from the rest is that this model is actually sustainable.
@STACCoverflow IN(sane)F++ i love the way this is constructed. @STACCoverflow got the reward system down. Lets get $inf++ to the next up. ♾️
@STACCoverflow Had to sell my bag, profited a decent bit but needed some emergency money. Payday is this Friday so you know what that means.. 👀 MORE INF++
@STACCoverflow all I know is if tek is tekkin we win winning
@STACCoverflow @inf_plusplus is a true long-term hold. Watch this one take off.
@STACCoverflow tekk is tekking stacc is staccing beliebers in - jeeters out
@STACCoverflow I really hope to win an award once
@STACCoverflow This is the only Ponzi project where the dev is actively working on the project day after day. Makes sense why @solana follows him $img $shower $ibr $storm
@STACCoverflow Hey @STACCoverflow are these % set for ever or is there a possibility to adjust it as per the need and market condition ?