Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

Mass spec bioinformatician by day, mass spec bioinformatician by night Maryland, USA Joined May 2019

Tweets

188
Followers

346
Following

166
Likes

182

US HUPO @us_hupo

a year ago

@us_hupo Ed&Out committee announces our new data of the month highlight. Coming out of the @LauLabColorado, a Jordan Currie et al. publication in Nature Commmunications:nature.com/articles/s4146…

1 5 5 934 1

Download Image

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(9/9)I just thought our field should know this and comment on it as it may directly impact collaborators, post-docs, grad students and how we share data at large. If you would like to make a comment yourself, the steps are listed here: federalregister.gov/documents/2024…

0 0 0 70 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(8/9)They are currently asking for comment on several aspects of this order that may be pertinent to our field 1.) Recommendations assessing the risks and benefits of regulating ‘omics data 2.) Should they include other ‘omics data beyond ‘omics data where a genome can be derived

0 0 0 61 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(7/9) If a dataset contains >1,000 human samples, their opinion is that it should be controlled by the current attorney general, and that they will determine what “transactions pose an unacceptable risk to national security.”

0 0 0 53 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(6/9) Caveat here is that someone from these countries who currently resides in the U.S. is not banned from accessing this data. After this, they throw in human genomics and other ‘omics-derived data into the bulk data category.

0 0 0 54 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(5/9) In the beginning of this document, they state their case for controlling bulk data, arguing the need to prevent the tracking/blackmailing of military officials, law enforcement officers, lawyers, etc. by “countries of concern,” or by citizens of said countries.

0 0 0 50 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(4/9) Within 180 Days of the executive order, the DOJ and NSA will come out with rules regarding this executive order. On March 4th an “Advance notice of proposed rulemaking” statement in which they detail what their plan is and are asking for comment federalregister.gov/documents/2024….

0 0 0 46 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(3/9) It is recommended that the “logical or physical access” of human derived ‘omics data be controlled. It specifically points out epigenomic, proteomic, transcriptomic, microbiomics or metabolomic data.

0 0 0 70 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(2/9) This should be relevant for anyone who works in genomics, proteomics or metabolomics. Executive order 14117 was released at the end of February concerning bulk datasets being exploited for AI training by “countries of concern” whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/….

0 0 0 145 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

a year ago

(1/9) Ok so per my last post, since there is so much government jargon in this document, I attempted to make a TLDR. Have to add the typical “my opinions are my own and this is just my personal interpretation on this” statement.

0 1 1 567 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

3 years ago

and this close!!

0 0 4 0 0

Download Image

Elizabeth Rasmussen @elizabeth_rasmu

3 years ago

Great first talk at #ACSFall2022 #ACSChicago talk by @SpecInformatics on how to be a scientist for the US government 🥳

0 1 3 0 0

Download Image

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

4 years ago

Looking for a early career/mid-level researcher to join our lab! workforcenow.adp.com/mascsr/default…

0 1 1 0 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

5 years ago

Twitch, video games, proteomics, and organ on a chip systems! Ask a scientist gaming live tonight! reddit.com/r/massspectrom…

0 0 0 0 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

5 years ago

Ya know, there are just some nights you need to forget the calamity in the world and watch spectra accumulate

3 0 16 0 0

Download Image

Alexey Nesvizhskii @nesvilab

5 years ago

Release of #FragPipe 14 with new features, MSFragger 3.1 (includes new DIA mode!), DIA-Umpire, IonQuant with MBR, PTM-Shepherd, and more! fragpipe.nesvilab.org. And so, my fellow proteomics friends, ask not what FragPipe can do for you. Ask what you cannot do without FragPipe.

5 19 71 0 1

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

5 years ago

Thermo's Virtual User's meeting for the Americas is Sept 29th to Oct 2nd. New Proteome Discoverer 2.5 and Compound Discoverer 3.2 and some cool talks! gateway.on24.com/wcc/eh/2591233…

0 3 4 0 0

Conor Jenkins @SpecInformatics

5 years ago

PSA for future/current users of Thermo Mass specs with FAIMS capabilities. Don't know if this is widely known but if you use Proteome Discoverer to process your data, you need Proteome Discoverer 2.4 to process your FAIMS data. So you will need to pony up for the upgrade from 2.x