Stephen Dewitt @TheComplexBrain

Ass. Professor | Fan of nuance https://t.co/rwN9qtcbfo thecomplexbrain.com University College London Joined January 2014

Tweets

397
Followers

276
Following

442
Likes

560

Stephen Dewitt @TheComplexBrain

a year ago

My brain won't stop trying to parse this company's sign into a single sentence in various ways ...

0 0 3 165 0

Download Image

Stephen Dewitt @TheComplexBrain

3 years ago

Just found an awesome preprint by @themichjam @maddi_pow @GiselaGovaart 'Reflexivity in #quantitative research: a rationale and beginner’s guide' - Yes, yes, yes! It's definitely making it's way into my '#qualitative and #mixedmethods' module next term! psyarxiv.com/xvrhm

2 4 11 0 4

David Lagnado @david_lagnado

4 years ago

Massive congrats to @alice_liefgreen who passed her phd with flying colours today - she’s produced an amazing body of research and I’m privileged to be involved - thanks also to 2 great examiners @SamuelGBJohnson and David Shanks and to @ProfRuthMorgan 🥳🥳

6 2 32 0 0

Steve Haroz 📊👁️🧠 @sharoz

4 years ago

Title: A > B Abstract: A > B Results: A > B Limitations: The method probably isn't a valid comparison of A and B Conclusion: A > B

4 63 580 0 16

Andreas De Block @DeblockBlock

4 years ago

Stop funding research (the way you do) Because it is wasteful, unethical and unscientific A thread (1/16)

168 3K 9K 0 3K

Neuroskeptic 🇺🇦 @Neuro_Skeptic

4 years ago

"Psychology is fundamentally incompatible with hypothesis-driven theoretical science" pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34878945/ Shots fired! See this @chrisdc77 @lakens @BrianNosek

19 60 217 0 117

Download Image

Stephen Dewitt @TheComplexBrain

4 years ago

Something that would be amazing: a journal rejects your manuscript after receiving reviews because it doesn't fit their remit. They send your manuscript complete with the reviews to one of their parent company's other journals which they think would be a more appropriate fit.

1 0 3 0 0

Brian Nosek (@[email protected]) @BrianNosek

4 years ago

Published! Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology @eLife * 193 experiments planned, 50 completed. Challenges in transparency, sharing, & implementation doi.org/10.7554/eLife.… * Replication effect sizes were 85% smaller on avg than original effects doi.org/10.7554/eLife.… 1/

13 403 857 0 156

Download Image

@mavadillo.bsky.social @mavadillo

4 years ago

Very proud of this one, with David Shanks and @SimoneMalejka "The challenge of inferring unconscious mental processes", just published in @ExpPsychJournal

Experimental Psychology - @exppsychjournal.bsky.so @ExpPsychJournal

4 years ago

Very proud of this one, with David Shanks and @SimoneMalejka "The challenge of inferring unconscious mental processes", just published in @ExpPsychJournal

1 4 12 0 2

Download Image

4 11 33 0 2

Cory Doctorow NONCONSENSUAL BLUE TICK @doctorow

4 years ago

It's hard to overstate what a scam academic and scientific publishing is. 1/

185 5K 16K 0 3K

Download Image

Nïck Brown🌻 @sTeamTraen

4 years ago

New blog post: A catastrophic failure of peer review in obstetrics and gynaecology steamtraen.blogspot.com/2021/10/a-cata…

14 76 210 0 42

Brian Nosek (@[email protected]) @BrianNosek

4 years ago

ICYMI: "Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science" is now in print at the Annual Reviews Print version: annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114… Green OA: psyarxiv.com/ksfvq/

Brian Nosek (@[email protected]) @BrianNosek

5 years ago

ICYMI: "Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science" is now in print at the Annual Reviews Print version: annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114… Green OA: psyarxiv.com/ksfvq/

5 133 372 0 103

Download Image

1 29 101 0 22

David Lagnado @david_lagnado

4 years ago

Very excited that my book is out today - ‘Explaining the Evidence: How the Mind Investigates the World’ - tinyurl.com/36pcvfx4 tinyurl.com/55nmduzy So many people to thank for inspiration and support, including @CambUP_Psych @profnfenton @yudapearl @nicholaraihani

16 38 224 0 40

Download Image

L. Maaike Helmus @MaaikeHelmus

4 years ago

Action editor of Psychology, Crime & Law has informed me it's the journal's policy for manuscripts NOT to report non-significant findings. Have they never heard of the replication crisis? Or publication bias? Or APA's journal article reporting standards? 1/2 @APA @AcademicChatter