It’s rare to see an argument quite as ill thought out as this one.
@_mikepound "complex copyright questions", but, nonetheless, there are questions about copyright - complex or not - its trained on some (lots of?) copyrighted material, and are we to trust Zuck's crew as the arbiter of what is deemed worthy of remuneration and what is "invaluable". Nope!
@_mikepound He might be suggesting that the margin value to his AI model of any individual 'data' is tiny: he could take it or leave it. As long as he can get his petabytes elsewhere.
@_mikepound By trying to implant a seed of doubt to content creators, it makes it less likely for those folks to sue when Meta's generative AI steals their work.
@_mikepound Well, it can be said in a more soothing manner. That doesn't mean that it's not true.