Well, it always depends on what you consider 1.0 😁 It's been quite stable and valuable for years I think, but things like missing generics, method references or lambdas reported as strange synthetic methods bugged me too much 😉

Daniel Bryant @danielbryantuk

3 years ago

Well, it always depends on what you consider 1.0 😁 It's been quite stable and valuable for years I think, but things like missing generics, method references or lambdas reported as strange synthetic methods bugged me too much 😉

0 6 12 0 1

@codecholeric Ah, great context! Yeah, and to be honest, I never even worried about the pre-1.0.0 label, as I was a happy customer 😀 I've just looked, and in our book we gave the 0.5.0 version of the framework a shout: learning.oreilly.com/library/view/c…