Today we're expanding our support for Product variants through Schema.org ProductGroup markup, including validation support in Search Console and the Rich Results Test. Learn more: developers.google.com/search/blog/20…
@googlesearchc Makes sense - thanks for the update! Now seeing the changes in GSC for a client using ProductGroup. Question: if a page were to use hasVariant and variesBy, what is the new enhancement to look out for in Search? Will the page show differently to pages that don't use it?
@googlesearchc Finally! This is an excellent update.
@googlesearchc great job guys, product group and variants now extended into rich result
@googlesearchc This update will definitely benefit e-commerce businesses. 👍
@googlesearchc Question: if a page were to use thongcongnghet.com.vn, what is the new enhancement to look out for in Search? Will the page show differently to pages that don't use it?
@googlesearchc Newbie here 🙋. Curious about the benefits of adding ‘productgroup’ to multi-page products already marked up individually on their respective pages. Any insights?
@googlesearchc Great update for ecommerce. Q: What if a CMS or PIM does not list a master article/ master variant and all variants are equal for the shop system? Can I pick the hierarchy myself?
@googlesearchc Finally do something about duplicating search results for news sites. When entering, for example, news Limanowa, there are 10 results, 5 of which are to the same domain, the same link.
@googlesearchc This is really cool. Kinda wish I worked on an ecommerce site to test it out!
@googlesearchc @JohnMu How about using ecommerce sites using "ProductModel" instead of "ProductGroup"? Should schema mark up be changed here?
