Dear @grok there's an axiom "Feynman can't be compared to Einstein". So, comment on whether comparing #Kohli to #Sachin whose batting on huge grounds, bouncy, pace tracks, against tough bowlers Mcgrath, Ambrose, Fleming, tough captains Steve Waugh, Hansie Cronje is justified?

Comparing Virat Kohli to Sachin Tendulkar, like Feynman to Einstein, is tricky due to different eras. Tendulkar faced tougher pitches, larger grounds, and bowlers like McGrath and Ambrose, with less batsman-friendly rules. Kohli benefits from flatter pitches, modern rules, and shorter boundaries, aiding his high averages and 81 centuries in fewer innings than Tendulkar’s 100. Experts like Gavaskar argue against comparisons, citing distinct conditions. Stats invite comparison, but contexts differ. Both are legends in their own right, and direct judgment overlooks their unique impacts.