Here's a transcript of my opening remarks in this space, hosted by Neil Oliver @thecoastguy and Dr Kat Lindley @KLVeritas which I thoroughly enjoyed. "Hi Neil. Very interesting discussion so far. The bit that really resonated for me was Malcolm Roberts @MRobertsQLD—the overall perspective that he gave us of the climate crisis being complete nonsense, and I think that generally applies to all of these crises. For me, from the very beginning, every aspect of the Covid crisis has been complete nonsense. “I’m continually aghast at how people in the skeptical community, …. whether they are obsessing over the vaccines or ivermectin, are missing the point. The spike protein or contamination, or whatever, these are all issues—I’m not denying that there isn’t substance to any of them—but the basic story is that the entire narrative of Covid is bullshit. "So too with the climate crisis, so too with the trans crisis, so too with the white supremacy crisis, and the gender-based violence crisis, and so on. These are all nonsense narratives, and they’re narratives that sustain themselves in the mind only of stupid people, to echo the comments of Christine @AndersonAfDMdEP . "And this idea that any kind of solution that involves centralisation has any hope of solving any kind of problem, real or perceived, is equally stupid. "So this is where we are politically, but I’ll tell you now, that when it comes to freedom of speech, the notion that is suppressed more than any other is the one I’ve just presented—that [all these crises are] nonsense and that centralisation is a solution to nothing. "If they are talking right now about vaccine harms, or the joys of ivermectin or the dangers of the spike protein, you find the leading lights in the community have no problem getting half a million followers or appearing on Tucker Carlson. But if you’re out there, just generally warning that the entire story was nonsense, and that the point is that we do not need solutions, then you are off every list. "And the really poignant aspect of all of this, is that, when I look back to the other folk who were around at the beginning of the Covid episode, calling bullshit, none of them have ever achieved any material following. I think of Knut Wittkowski, I think of Mike Yeadon, I think of people like @Thomas_Binder, who I was so desperately hoping would be here this evening, because a lot of what I’ve said was inspired by his very first foray into social media on Twitter—it was a rant in German where he used the word “nonsens” about 40 times in a row, just taking aim at every element of the received Covid narrative. “But it just strikes me that the people who saw things clearly in March and April of 2020 are still, to this day, invisible. So we may think that the advent of Twitter 2.0 has given rise to something and has changed something, but I rather think that it hasn’t, and that we’re in a situation where the clearest thinkers who saw this world clearly, and didn’t have to wait until there was something obviously murky with the vaccines or whatever, to speak up—the people who saw the world clearly are simply consigned to the shadows. There’s just no profile, there’s no invitation to speak, there’s no connection to any of the major dissident media figures. “And I think that’s really important. What censorship does is is to teach us where the truth is. Nobody ever censored bullshit. Censorship takes aim at things that are true. So we should not go looking for the million follower person who’s got a rant over hydroxychloroquine, or whatever, to look for leadership and insight into the world. That’s where you most definitely will not find it. We need to start looking at what it is you’re not allowed to say, because that’s where we can find out exactly what is going on. “It’s very difficult. I mean, I flex back and forth between Christine’s perspective, where I take a look at Tony Blair @InstituteGC and I take a look at Augustin Carstens @BIS_org, and these luminaries of the globalist movement, and I listen to their words, and all that I can see really is stupidity—the shallowness of the thinking, this kind of incredible hubristic notion that “oh, we know how the world works and we’re going to implement this system and it’s going to be for the greater good”. Even if their objectives are population reductionism or whatever; even if there’s some horrible thing lurking at the bottom of the plan, centralised plans don’t work, and only stupid people believe that they do. “So I vascilate between that perspective that we’re dealing with a pandemic of stupidity—possibly the only kind of pandemic that can actually exist—and then the idea that no, this is all too targeted and too precise. That the fact that we never hear from Knut Wittkowski and the fact that you have to scratch really hard to find Wolfgang @wodarg saying anything, and that Mike Yeadon is reduced to running around with a Telegram account. Or Thomas Binder—if you want to talk about censorship, we can all bemoan getting tossed off Twitter at some or other stage in 2020 or 2021 or whatever. But it’s kind of extreme when your censorship involved you being stuffed into a strait jacket and thrown into an asylum, which is what happened to him. Maybe we should be listening harder to the people who that happened to.”
Here's a transcript of my opening remarks in this space, hosted by Neil Oliver @thecoastguy and Dr Kat Lindley @KLVeritas which I thoroughly enjoyed. "Hi Neil. Very interesting discussion so far. The bit that really resonated for me was Malcolm Roberts @MRobertsQLD—the overall perspective that he gave us of the climate crisis being complete nonsense, and I think that generally applies to all of these crises. For me, from the very beginning, every aspect of the Covid crisis has been complete nonsense. “I’m continually aghast at how people in the skeptical community, …. whether they are obsessing over the vaccines or ivermectin, are missing the point. The spike protein or contamination, or whatever, these are all issues—I’m not denying that there isn’t substance to any of them—but the basic story is that the entire narrative of Covid is bullshit. "So too with the climate crisis, so too with the trans crisis, so too with the white supremacy crisis, and the gender-based violence crisis, and so on. These are all nonsense narratives, and they’re narratives that sustain themselves in the mind only of stupid people, to echo the comments of Christine @AndersonAfDMdEP . "And this idea that any kind of solution that involves centralisation has any hope of solving any kind of problem, real or perceived, is equally stupid. "So this is where we are politically, but I’ll tell you now, that when it comes to freedom of speech, the notion that is suppressed more than any other is the one I’ve just presented—that [all these crises are] nonsense and that centralisation is a solution to nothing. "If they are talking right now about vaccine harms, or the joys of ivermectin or the dangers of the spike protein, you find the leading lights in the community have no problem getting half a million followers or appearing on Tucker Carlson. But if you’re out there, just generally warning that the entire story was nonsense, and that the point is that we do not need solutions, then you are off every list. "And the really poignant aspect of all of this, is that, when I look back to the other folk who were around at the beginning of the Covid episode, calling bullshit, none of them have ever achieved any material following. I think of Knut Wittkowski, I think of Mike Yeadon, I think of people like @Thomas_Binder, who I was so desperately hoping would be here this evening, because a lot of what I’ve said was inspired by his very first foray into social media on Twitter—it was a rant in German where he used the word “nonsens” about 40 times in a row, just taking aim at every element of the received Covid narrative. “But it just strikes me that the people who saw things clearly in March and April of 2020 are still, to this day, invisible. So we may think that the advent of Twitter 2.0 has given rise to something and has changed something, but I rather think that it hasn’t, and that we’re in a situation where the clearest thinkers who saw this world clearly, and didn’t have to wait until there was something obviously murky with the vaccines or whatever, to speak up—the people who saw the world clearly are simply consigned to the shadows. There’s just no profile, there’s no invitation to speak, there’s no connection to any of the major dissident media figures. “And I think that’s really important. What censorship does is is to teach us where the truth is. Nobody ever censored bullshit. Censorship takes aim at things that are true. So we should not go looking for the million follower person who’s got a rant over hydroxychloroquine, or whatever, to look for leadership and insight into the world. That’s where you most definitely will not find it. We need to start looking at what it is you’re not allowed to say, because that’s where we can find out exactly what is going on. “It’s very difficult. I mean, I flex back and forth between Christine’s perspective, where I take a look at Tony Blair @InstituteGC and I take a look at Augustin Carstens @BIS_org, and these luminaries of the globalist movement, and I listen to their words, and all that I can see really is stupidity—the shallowness of the thinking, this kind of incredible hubristic notion that “oh, we know how the world works and we’re going to implement this system and it’s going to be for the greater good”. Even if their objectives are population reductionism or whatever; even if there’s some horrible thing lurking at the bottom of the plan, centralised plans don’t work, and only stupid people believe that they do. “So I vascilate between that perspective that we’re dealing with a pandemic of stupidity—possibly the only kind of pandemic that can actually exist—and then the idea that no, this is all too targeted and too precise. That the fact that we never hear from Knut Wittkowski and the fact that you have to scratch really hard to find Wolfgang @wodarg saying anything, and that Mike Yeadon is reduced to running around with a Telegram account. Or Thomas Binder—if you want to talk about censorship, we can all bemoan getting tossed off Twitter at some or other stage in 2020 or 2021 or whatever. But it’s kind of extreme when your censorship involved you being stuffed into a strait jacket and thrown into an asylum, which is what happened to him. Maybe we should be listening harder to the people who that happened to.”
@NickHudsonCT @thecoastguy @KLVeritas @MRobertsQLD Rose Webster @GetMyGist here ♀️🇨🇦. @KLVeritas gave 1 post of mine a "like" and OMG Juliette Engel MD (@Xoxlova on Gab) ACTUALLY wrote a reply with a question to me (attached). But #manels & #BoysClubs have quashed #WomenInSTEM & #Nurses, it seems. Sad. x.com/maggini_19/sta…