CKB and @solana are two completely different takes on the challenges facing adoption of blockchain systems, but there are some similarities in approach ! I will mint a @CKBees NFT for the 2 best answers covering the technical characteristics CKB and Solana share Beeeeeee great!

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees I am not 100% if this is everything or even it, but what I see: 1. Both use 'rust' and have on-chain executables + can have dependencies. 2. Both use 'rent' in which you must have a certain amount of the Native Token allocated with the "account" for it to be on-chain

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees $CKB @NervosNetwork to the moon baby! @Bitcoin

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees They focus in scalable and secure Dapps, looking for scability and have descentralization. Another similarity is the use of Rust and the lower cost i n transations fees.

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees I trust CKB as much I don't trust Solana.

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees 1. Both allow building scalable and secure decentralized applications. 2. Both prioritize scalability 3. Both aim to maintain decentralization. 4. Both support smart contracts.

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees 1. State rent. - Solana uses prepaid-rental model to directly collect rent - CKB uses tail emission and indirectly collect rent via inflation 2. Tail emission - Solana adopts tail emisson to "achieve" 'low fee' - CKB adopts tail emisson to collect rent and achieve 'low fee'

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees ckb need more marketing --> for moonshot

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees Both had an ico and therefore an unfair distribution

@matt_bitcoin @solana @CKBees I'm not sure if that counts as two but: 1) They both try to introduce a solution that scales/ higher throughput (L2 for CKB) 2) They both want an option for drastically lower costs (L2 for CKB)