Truly bizarre. Couple of years ago a secular, Supreme court of India decided that women could enter Sabrimala temple going against the religious beliefs of thousands of Hindu devotees. Did you know that? I am sure you didn’t or you would have protested like this. Right?
Truly bizarre. Couple of years ago a secular, Supreme court of India decided that women could enter Sabrimala temple going against the religious beliefs of thousands of Hindu devotees. Did you know that? I am sure you didn’t or you would have protested like this. Right?
@sunandavashisht And it was non-believers who filed petitions; it was non-believers who wanted to exercise the right to pray in Shanarimala Temple and some Judges whose judicial mind narrowed their perceptions ruled ‘so be it!’
@sunandavashisht Of course he knew, but the have the right to eternally play the victim card. Every other victim is actually a sore loser.
@sunandavashisht @sunandavashisht ji let’s see if @mehdirhasan has the guts to comment on Justice Jaibunnisa Khazi who actually rejected the arguments!!
@sunandavashisht @sunandavashisht ji let’s see if @mehdirhasan has the guts to comment on Justice Jaibunnisa Khazi who actually rejected the arguments!!
@sunandavashisht Why you enter into argument with someone who does not understand india Or its laws.
@sunandavashisht And burqa-clad women formed human chain on roads saying "Sabarimalai should be open for women of all ages" without realising the irony..
@sunandavashisht Hijab ban is justified. India is not an Islamic Republic.
@sunandavashisht And the funniest part of Sabarimala case was the Muslim women participation in the Human wall from Kasaragod to Trivandrum. It was hilarious cos they aren't allowed inside mosques "religious beliefs" but they want to poke in others beliefs. @mehdirhasan any comments on that?
@sunandavashisht @mehdirhasan - Being secular doesn't mean appeasement of Muslims. Unfortunately, this has been the case for quite a while. India has had enough of it. India is not here to build a caliphate.
@sunandavashisht Did the court at that study vedas etc and/or, ask Hindu scholars whether practice filled by Sabrimala was consistent with the religious texts? Or was it a “secular” verdict?
@sunandavashisht Against minority Hindus’s Brahminical traditions
@sunandavashisht @ram1461 Most of the patriots including BJP welcomed the Sabarimala judgement initially but later when they found that there is a chance for taking some political advantage they changed their attitude.
@sunandavashisht "Sabarimala review (2020) clearly shows that the Supreme Court itself is in doubt about the correctness of the essentiality doctrine and whether courts should assume the role of clergy" indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
@sunandavashisht Oh yes! If @mehdirhasan had an iota of info about this, he would have declared India a bizzare place right then. It was such a secret!
@sunandavashisht @Ajeya22 Agenda based opinion. Seriously we should start ignoring them and stop seeing their shows.
@sunandavashisht That was #woke #Feminism; this is #wokiapa. The global #ecosystem is feeling insecure in India! Darr ka mahol hai ji! Don't trust me, neeche padhiye:
@sunandavashisht But they corrected their mistake and re iewed the decision. Do you know that ? Even if you know that you don't want to mention.
@sunandavashisht He is a communal bigot....it's useless to argue...it's in their DNA ....
@sunandavashisht The ten stages of genocide are an academic model created by Gregory Stanton, the founder of Genocide Watch, to explain how genocide develops. The Hindu haters now articulate the 6th stage, I.e, Polarisation or broadcast polarising propaganda. Mehdi is part of this ecosystem.
@sunandavashisht Hindus fought against Hindus in SC to enter the temple. Let me make it clear I was against this, when there is a tradition why to break it with show of strength? Let Muslim women fight Hijab. Adhere to school rules of uniform while admission. Hindus deciding to wear or No?
@sunandavashisht Just one sentence for these secularists. Take a Chill pill and live with it .
@sunandavashisht Have some mercy Mam, every time you split them apart with swag. Keep going🤣🤣
@sunandavashisht Also the difference being this is a public Govt institution with uniform and the other is a religious place of worship. And yet they cry!!!
@sunandavashisht Court decided on the question brought before the bench, facts did not bear out petitioner’s assertion…… careful what you wish for ………… now it is documented as court order and sets a precedent. Good luck with Supreme Court.
@sunandavashisht They are all anti Hindu gang members.
@sunandavashisht onmanorama.com/news/kerala/20… Know the facts before betraying your ignorence.
@sunandavashisht Yes, the court did order entry of women into sabarimala but it was never allowed to be practiced by the BJP and other rw organisations . RSS initially supported the verdict but went back on it seeing the political opportunity it presented in Kerala.
@sunandavashisht That us stupid and this too. There are certain customs and practices - which may be stupid or senseless - but better for outsiders to@not interfere. Uniforms must bebthere; but then should a girl wear a shawl as hijab or as a stylish scarf - none of it should bother anyone else
@sunandavashisht Fellows like Hasan can take pride in one thing: their blatant unfairness to Hindus turned huge numbers of Hindus into resolute Hindu nationalists. Only his lot could have done it. The Hindu nationalist parties by themselves had failed to achieve it over many decades of effort.
