• typescript Profile Picture

    TypeScript @typescript

    4 years ago

    Could we have TypeScript with no build step? Could we have types in JavaScript? Maybe! We're exploring bringing optional type syntax into the JavaScript language! devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/a-p…

    131 1K 5K 0 258
  • typescript Profile Picture

    TypeScript @typescript

    4 years ago

    The Types as Comments proposal means that browsers could run TypeScript-checked code directly, (even though they wouldn't do any type-checking). That means faster iteration with all the type-checking and editing experience you know and love today.

    5 13 303 0 3
  • threejs Profile Picture

    Three.js @threejs

    4 years ago

    @typescript @thespite +1

    1 0 18 0 0
  • bcrypt Profile Picture

    yan @bcrypt

    4 years ago

    @typescript seems really similar to the type checking in Closure compiler which was my favorite way to write js! ++ for this

    1 0 9 0 0
  • dawntraoz Profile Picture

    Alba Silvente @dawntraoz

    4 years ago

    @typescript I am clairvoyant 🔮 (CRA-ZY)

    dawntraoz tweet picture

    0 1 5 0 1
    Download Image
  • JessTelford Profile Picture

    Jess Telford 🐘 @[email protected] @JessTelford

    4 years ago

    @typescript

    1 0 7 0 0
  • alexandereardon Profile Picture

    Alex Reardon @alexandereardon

    4 years ago

    @typescript

    0 0 0 0 1
  • lewisl9029 Profile Picture

    Lewis Liu @lewisl9029

    4 years ago

    @typescript This proposal looks like an amazing opportunity to effectively deprecate runtime constructs that should never have been in TypeScript in the first place, such as Enums and class visibility modifiers. No breaking changes needed since this is opt-in!

    5 0 51 0 0
  • evanplaice Profile Picture

    🇺🇸 Evan Plaice 🇺🇸 @evanplaice

    4 years ago

    @typescript JSDoc typings already cover this use case 🤦🏼‍♂️ Including type checking, typings (ie .d.ts) generation And in VSCode: inline type checking, intellisense, and inline documentation I've been using build-less TS typed JS for years

    1 2 32 0 2
  • royalicing Profile Picture

    Patrick Smith @royalicing

    4 years ago

    @typescript Hmmm don’t really like this. The JavaScript parser still has to understand the types in some form in order to know what to ignore? What will you see in the Developer tools, will the types be shown there? Any minifier is going to strip these types anyway for a good reason.

    3 0 14 0 0
  • cjamcl Profile Picture

    Connor Clark @cjamcl

    4 years ago

    @typescript Would specing that browsers read `application/typescript` files in a type-ignoring manner solve the same issues, and be simpler by leaving the JS language untouched/avoiding TC39?

    3 0 7 0 0
  • wolfadex Profile Picture

    Wolfgang Schuster @wolfadex

    4 years ago

    @typescript Except that's not what this proposal is. Why then are you marketing it as "TS with no build step"?

    2 1 5 0 0
  • chovy Profile Picture

    chovy @chovy

    4 years ago

    @typescript Leave JavaScript alone. It’s fine the way it is.

    1 0 7 0 1
  • MartijnSaly Profile Picture

    Martijn ᗢ 💙🇺🇦💛 @MartijnSaly

    4 years ago

    @typescript Getting the actual typescript runtime in the browser, running typescript truly as-is with no transpilation step, would be ideal. And it would be feasible, given how eager browsers are to update. Your very own colleagues manage one of those browsers already!

    1 0 6 0 0
  • eyyyych Profile Picture

    eyyyyyyyy @eyyyych

    4 years ago

    @typescript Good god just use JavaScript and a better linter.

    3 0 6 0 0
  • alexweej Profile Picture

    @alex.weej.com @alexweej

    4 years ago

    @typescript I admire everyone's efforts here, but it's very troubling to be throwing away JS's ability to ever use type information at runtime, because the syntax space was taken up by everyone's pet type checker and we Don't Break The Web. It's going to be a fun ride...

    0 0 5 0 0
  • zoontek Profile Picture

    Mathieu A. @zoontek

    4 years ago

    @typescript This seems nice, but IMHO should get rid of some legacy syntax before 🙂

    2 0 5 0 0
  • vorbeigescrollt Profile Picture

    🐿 @vorbeigescrollt

    4 years ago

    @typescript How about a fast compiler that’s not written in JavaScript first? How would the type checking be faster if it still uses tsc under the hood. Tools like @vite_js already give us instant updates and type checks running concurrently. I would also love a TypeScript package registry!

    1 1 2 0 0
  • jgrosdubois Profile Picture

    Jon Dubois @jgrosdubois

    4 years ago

    @typescript This is a great idea. I've been hoping for something like this for a long time. It reminds me of the transition from ActionScript2 to ActionScript3 (also based on the ECMAScript standard). In AS3, types were optional but the code was interpreted at runtime (no transpilation).

    0 1 1 0 0
  • pendar747 Profile Picture

    Pendar @pendar747

    4 years ago

    @typescript Wouldn't it be much better to instead allow for using other languages in the browser and defining sdk's for them? Something like wasm but more practical. This is more like copying typescript features into javascript

    1 0 3 0 0
  • EdwardAEzekiel Profile Picture

    Edward Ezekiel @EdwardAEzekiel

    4 years ago

    @typescript Please please please let this proposal reach Stage 1!

    0 0 3 0 0
  • NoahJohnScales Profile Picture

    Noah Scales @NoahJohnScales

    4 years ago

    @typescript apropos of nothing (except positive possibilities for the language), how about support for tail call recursion in browsers?

    0 0 3 0 0
  • jsoneaday Profile Picture

    Dave Choi @jsoneaday

    4 years ago

    @typescript This is a wonderful stop gap proposal to real types, but ultimately I want full static typing in js for performance and to eliminate the need for using a separate language to do #webassembly

    1 0 3 0 0
  • coreh Profile Picture

    Marco Buono @coreh

    4 years ago

    @typescript I really like the idea of : as a "smart" comment syntax that's aware of commas and braces. 🔥 Not a big fan of adding `type` and `as` as new (contextual) keywords that also act like comments, though. That feels redundant, and I'd rather have TS adopt Flow cast syntax in JS mode

    1 0 3 0 0
  • ottokruse Profile Picture

    Otto Kruse @ottokruse

    4 years ago

    @typescript Python !

    0 0 2 0 0
  • Bitcollage Profile Picture

    Bitcollage 🇹🇷❤️🇬🇷 @Bitcollage

    4 years ago

    @typescript Instead of complaining here just read the proposal on GitHub properly. There are so many claims that are not true and those who have not used TS and never will have nothing to say here. Sorry if I have to express it so hard.

    0 0 2 0 0
  • TheTrueNemo Profile Picture

    Marco Pfeiffer @TheTrueNemo

    4 years ago

    @typescript But, that would mean that you can't add features to TypeScript unless you add it to the JavaScript specs and wait for engines to support it, right?

    0 0 1 0 0
  • dasdevnano Profile Picture

    𝒩𝒶𝓃𝑜 @dasdevnano

    4 years ago

    @typescript

    dasdevnano tweet picture

    0 0 1 0 0
    Download Image
  • writingjscript Profile Picture

    Writing JavaScript @writingjscript

    4 years ago

    @typescript For a type system, but comments are for humans. Have another iteration for a proper extension of the ECMAScript syntax, take inspiration from other modern languages such as Rust, Dart, Swift, as well TypeScript. I really think it could be great, but not with comment hacks! :)

    0 0 1 0 0
  • WarriorDevelop Profile Picture

    Alex - Warrior.dev ❌❌⭕ @WarriorDevelop

    4 years ago

    @typescript 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

    0 0 1 0 0
  • hhvdblom Profile Picture

    Herman van der Blom @hhvdblom

    4 years ago

    @typescript It feels wrong. You make a dynamic language static. The whole Idea feels stupid. Microsoft wants this, why? To push the backend stuff to the client?

    0 0 1 0 0
  • onhate Profile Picture

    a negação da negação @onhate

    4 years ago

    @typescript Aren't we going backwards? How can it be better?

    onhate tweet picture

    0 0 1 0 0
    Download Image
  • mittie Profile Picture

    Dierk König @[email protected] @mittie

    4 years ago

    @typescript I use jsDoc for optional typing in js since quite a while, see for example webengineering-fhnw.github.io/Kolibri/

    0 0 1 0 0
  • mmomtchev Profile Picture

    Momtchil Momtchev @mmomtchev

    4 years ago

    @typescript Frankly, what's the point of this? We already have ts-node, and on the backend, especially when unit testing - it makes sense. But what do you need this for on the frontend where you already have a mandatory deployment step anyway?

    1 0 1 0 0
  • proffictech Profile Picture

    Proffictech @proffictech

    4 years ago

    @typescript in my opinion, Typescript does great, but looks ugly sometimes and almost unreadable, but over all, it is great

    0 0 1 0 0
  • Download Image
    • Privacy
    • Term and Conditions
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • TwStalker is not affiliated with X™. All Rights Reserved. 2024 www.instalker.org

    twitter web viewer x profile viewer bayigram.com instagram takipçi satın al instagram takipçi hilesi twitter takipçi satın al tiktok takipçi satın al tiktok beğeni satın al tiktok izlenme satın al beğeni satın al instagram beğeni satın al youtube abone satın al youtube izlenme satın al sosyalgram takipçi satın al instagram ücretsiz takipçi twitter takipçi satın al tiktok takipçi satın al tiktok beğeni satın al tiktok izlenme satın al beğeni satın al instagram beğeni satın al youtube abone satın al youtube izlenme satın al metin2 metin2 wiki metin2 ep metin2 dragon coins metin2 forum metin2 board popigram instagram takipçi satın al takipçi hilesi twitter takipçi satın al tiktok takipçi satın al tiktok beğeni satın al tiktok izlenme satın al beğeni satın al instagram beğeni satın al youtube abone satın al youtube izlenme satın al buyfans buy instagram followers buy instagram likes buy instagram views buy tiktok followers buy tiktok likes buy tiktok views buy twitter followers buy telegram members Buy Youtube Subscribers Buy Youtube Views Buy Youtube Likes forstalk postegro web postegro x profile viewer