Doc Block @Block2Future

Great Scott! Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads. The Future Joined November 2024

Tweets

674
Followers

164
Following

224
Likes

409

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@eltwobra @monero 🟡 High amber risk level right now but not red yet Yes, short-term pressure: Qubic ~50–60% of last 100 (≈3h). But last 999 is ≈25% and no repeat deep reorgs → so not sustained control. Real risks? Yes, shallow re-orgs make it unsafe to use payments with a low-confirmation…

1 3 10 2K 1

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

🟡 High amber risk level for $Qubic attack on $XMR Increased short-term pressure: Qubic ~50–60% of last 100 (≈3h). But last 999 is ≈25% and no repeat deep reorgs → so not sustained control. Real risks? Yes, shallow re-orgs make it unsafe to use payments with a…

0 0 3 141 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@RareSatSociety @JacobKinge Either you can’t read your own screenshot or you think “Unknown 56%” is one pool. There’s no in-between. That page shows a 24h block attribution, not a hashrate table. “Unknown” = many untagged/solo/private miners. Centralization risk = controllable operator share over weeks, not…

1 1 3 117 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@iamDCinvestor “What is this? A pullback for ants? How can we be expected to teach children to learn to hodl… if they can’t even fit inside a 4% red candle? The dip needs to be at least… three times bigger!” — Derek Zoolander on BTC drop 🧱📉

1 1 3 265 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@JacobKinge 1/5 Engagement farming dressed up as “unique analysis.” Take a real risk, add extreme/wrong claims, stir outrage → clicks. Attention gained, credibility lost. 2/5 Mining centralization is a real risk but not new. “Second time in history” is false. Top-2 >50% has happened…

2 2 36 6K 9

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@sassal0x Translation: some ETH news, everyone needs to buy! Ok Sassal, thanks for the shill. I like ETH, but not a fan of holders just shouting from the hill tops asking for more people to pump their bags. With big following, comes big responsibility.

4 1 4 277 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

Another terrible and deeply irresponsible take on $Qubic attack on Monero. What happened to don't trust, verify? Sigh. Warning, the following post contains engagement farming that people with integrity may find disturbing. x.com/Justin_Bons/st…

Justin Bons @Justin_Bons

2 weeks ago

321 192 979 246K 443

2 2 19 1K 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

2 weeks ago

@Justin_Bons Claims ≠ reality. Your post = ENGAGEMENT FARMING What happened to don't trust, verify? Follow blocks, not boasts. 🟡 Amber risk rating at worst 🟢 Low risk level right now Public data show Qubic ~30–40% in ~3h windows and ~20–25% over ~33h. Never sustained majority. The…

1 2 24 854 1

Doc Block @Block2Future

3 weeks ago

@c___f___b Pressure ≠ capture. And forget hasrate - follow the blocks (last 100 / last 999) 🟡 Amber risk level right now: <45% (100) & <35% (999) 🔴 Flashing red when ≥50% (100) & ≥35–40% (999) & multi-block reorgs Speedometers can lie, the scoreboard can’t.…

3 2 5 1K 1

Doc Block @Block2Future

3 weeks ago

🟡 Risk rating for $Qubic attack on $XMR → elevated pressure, not majority control. • Qubic.org = 32% of last 100 blocks (~3h) • 22.5% of last 999 (~33h) Risk meter 🟢 <30% (100) & <25% (1,000) 🟡 30–45% (100) or 25–35% (1,000) ← now 🔴 ≥50% (100) for hours &…

2 1 6 742 3

Doc Block @Block2Future

3 weeks ago

@IOHK_Charles @IOHK_Charles Care to provide an updated comment here? x.com/c___f___b/stat…

Come-from-Beyond @c_f_b

3 weeks ago

@IOHK_Charles @IOHK_Charles Care to provide an updated comment here? x.com/c___f___b/stat…

12 27 167 15K 13

1 2 3 58 0

Doc Block @Block2Future

4 weeks ago

@P3b7_ Claim ≠ reality. No verified 51%: “Unknown” is ~33% (last 100) / ~22% (last 999) - not a majority. “Major reorg” = depth-1 orphans; no multi-block reorgs. $75M/day is fantasy: Monero issues ~432 XMR/day; even 100% hash earns that, not $75M. Check yourself:…