Boxed @DeliveryBox

⚠️ Bitcoin not untouchable. Rewards shrinking → weaker security Devs too rigid Quantum threat looming 👉 Justin Bons: BTC could collapse in 7–11 years. Will it adapt or fade?

🚨 $BONK is seriously heating up 🚀 Small bags today, big dreams tomorrow. Community power + hype are fueling BONK’s momentum. Many see it as the new symbol of financial freedom. 👉 Are you ready to ride the BONK wave before the next pump?

Analyst Predicts a 90% Rally for Arbitrum (ARB) – Here's What Needs to Happen First In a recent article, the analyst highlighted how ARB price has bounced off a key support zone, suggesting that a successful retest could trigger a strong rally in the coming weeks

Because for testing, normally 1 BTC is more than enough. You can try multiple things and be totally fine with 1 BTC.

It definitely has. Here is a good read about it: blog.lopp.net/griefing-bitco…

Here they come: mempool.space/testnet/tx/859… You don't need to return them to me. Good luck

If you truly believe, that test coins are worthless, then why do you think, that this amount is "big"? Everything multiplied by zero gives you zero.QuoteI was given a big amount (unecessarily big for testing)

without asking anyone. The only case, when someone needs test coins, which are accepted by the rest of the network, is trading. Everything else can be tested locally.

So, testing things does not require getting any test coins from anyone. Just invalidating the last N blocks from 20 minutes, and mining your own block on top of that, with the current timestamp, will instantly give you some coins,

which will do anything you want. And then, you can reconnect with the network, and see, how your coins are reorged, so they are truly worthless.

I never saw any developer, who wanted to test something, and was forced to get test coins from another user. You can just disconnect from the network, wait 20 minutes, and then you can mine a single block on just a CPU

When Bitcoin Core will remove support for it in next releases, then it will be treated as every other altcoin. And a lot of people wouldn't even notice it, if exchanges and users simply won't upgrade their nodes, and stay with the old version, to use testnet.

Quote If they did have value, they would simply be an altcoin. Well, testnet3 is going in that direction.

Quote The main reason why these coins exist is to not have value. Then it failed. In both testnet3 and testnet4. Because both are actively traded.

especially sending and receiving BTC offline within the same ecosystem. I write, whitepapers, pitch decks, press releases, go to market research and strategy planning plans/consultation>

Address: <tb1qcjk5t9ecaahm9nf9e4xafsyxlzt26nr2qp0ted> Reason: < I am testing multi-sig wallets in the use case of group savings and community banking models using BTC

Yeah, follow the format in the original post and I will gladly offer some. Just tell me a bit about what you write (and what you test) in the "reason".

Hello, I am copywriter within the crypto space and also dub as a tester so would love to have some sir.

I want to give them to developers or testers who need to test bitcoin features and functionalities.

Thanks, but I am highly against selling them. The main reason why these coins exist is to not have value. If they did have value, they would simply be an altcoin.