HodlMe @Hodl_Botello

BTC/USDT: Holding Key 108,200 Support Price: 108,818 USDT (H: 109,480 – L: 108,191). Bulls defend 108,200; strong resistance at 109,500. Setup: Long above 108,800 → TP: 109,500 → 110,200 → 111,000. SL: below 108,100.💰📷

Quick look at $WLFI 👇 Total: 25B Launch: 5B circulating First 24h: 13B locked By Sept 1 → only 3.4B liquid With supply this tight… 🦅👉 $WLFI looks like a steal. 🚀🥳

🚀 Ethereum 2025 could hit $25K on institutional inflows. 69 US firms now hold 4.1M ETH (~$17.6B), 3.4% of supply. BitMine leads with 1.52M ETH, SharpLink follows with 741K ETH. Despite strong demand, ETH trades near $4,246. It even dropped 10% this past week

$BNB All eyes on $900 Soon...👀👀👀

Quote from: satscraper on May 21, 2025, 07:47:29 AM This has to be one of the most absurd BIPs I’ve ever seen. No one needs it in my view.

Should we also get rid of cents, and make 1 dollar actually be $100? Great idea.

yet now the idea is to confuse new users with a radical change in the use of units. Keep in mind that all search results from the past will have information which will be incorrect after such a change.

Whoever proposed this and whoever supports this has zero understanding of human psychology and making technology accessible and usable. Bitcoin is hard to use as is and much harder to understand,

This has to be one of the most absurd BIPs I’ve ever seen. No one needs it in my view.

I see that someone has got the big itch for bitcoin redemination. Who in their right mind would pay $100K for something that can still be mined at the rate of 312.5 million units every 10 minutes?

Lots of bitcoin software has selectable units, many websites do too.  People can change their defaults and don't need a BIP to do so.

A great example of a website naming something whatever they want is en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Compariso… calling BSV "CraigCoin".  📷 📷

0.00000000 is the least confusing way to present a BTC balance to a user, from my experiences.

Website owners are welcome to name anything they want, but then they have to deal with the support tickets too! 📷 I agree with y'all.  Rather pointless.

Jack Dorsey is blabbering about this(ish) on his Twitter account pretty frequently.  📷 IMO, if he wants to see the unit terms change... he should implement it on his website and see if it catches on.

We already have bits (100 satoshi), satoshi, mBTC (100K satoshi) and others. But it's only used on few occasions. Electrum use mBTC by default, but it made some newbie confused by it.

Quote from: vapourminer on May 19, 2025, 05:26:35 PM invent some new term, dont replace the original accepted term

Comments-URI: github.com/bitcoin/bips/w… Status: Draft Type: Informational Created: 2025-05-01 License: BSD-2-Clause

Code: BIP: 172 Layer: Applications Title: Define Bitcoin Subunits as Satoshis Author: OceanSlim <[email protected]> Comments-Summary: No comments yet.

this proposal aims to clearly and consistently document the existing practice in the bitcoin ecosystem. the smallest indivisible unit remains the satoshi, while 1 bitcoin (BTC) is still defined as 100,000,000 sats.