I read the study the Guardian called "groundbreaking" evidence that kids learn better on papers than on screens. The behavioral evidence was just n = 50 middle schoolers doing marginally and non-significantly worse on two sentence verification tasks.
There are some EEG results, but I don't see why they'd convince anyone if there was no behavioral effect. My opinion on that is reflected in this: x.com/cremieuxrecuei…
There are some EEG results, but I don't see why they'd convince anyone if there was no behavioral effect. My opinion on that is reflected in this: x.com/cremieuxrecuei…
@cremieuxrecueil This meta-analysis might pique your interest?
@cremieuxrecueil This meta-analysis might pique your interest?
@cremieuxrecueil "groundbreaking" "we tapped the dirt slightly and then rushed off to write a paper about it"
@cremieuxrecueil I don't care about studies, paper does something to the brain that screens do not.
@cremieuxrecueil At least the The Guardian explicitly states the study was n=59... they get points for that.
@cremieuxrecueil Audience captured (old people)