Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

@PhysInHistory Well, Bohr's model of the Atom has not held up; and Einstein's "Space-Time" gravity view is still Sci-Fi. And neither could explain how an Atom creates Gravity. All that is known about Gravity today is, Gravity gets stronger with increasing density of Atoms in a volume.

1 1 4 287 2

Download Image

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

8 months ago

insilicosci.com/hartree-fock-m…

0 0 0 17 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

8 months ago

why do this headlines grab us? this is fantastical in a bad way. the math is not like a blue print to build a time machine.. the proof is then something else,

RealClearScience @RCScience

8 months ago

why do this headlines grab us? this is fantastical in a bad way. the math is not like a blue print to build a time machine.. the proof is then something else,

0 1 4 451 1

Download Image

0 0 0 31 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

9 months ago

Did you ever hear about the babysecond before? Visualizing the Nucleus youtu.be/ach9JLGs2Yc?si… via @YouTube

0 0 0 21 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

10 months ago

phys.org/news/2024-11-t…

0 0 0 25 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

11 months ago

There are groups that approach protein folding/design from a more rational perspective than alpha fold/Bakers-lab reapectively.That the price was given more for folds and designs obtained not always from a purely physical model speaks volumes of the knowledge gap in those fields

0 0 0 36 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

11 months ago

Baker deserves the Nobel; Alpha Fold, I do not know. The irony is that alpha fold outperformed Baker's software, but 1/2 the Nobel was given to Baker. Some say Hassibis, winner of 1/4 Nobel doesn't deserve it. Baker work contributed to Randy Schekman's medicine Nobel prize, hmm

0 0 0 43 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

11 months ago

Baker is the most prominent figure in the field. IMO, he is only the second and purely computational chem/bio scientist to win the Nobel Prize after Martin Karplus. A great field with a lot of potential for positively impacting humanity. Who will the 3rd one be? Any suggestions?

The Nobel Prize @NobelPrize

11 months ago

516 9K 20K 9.0M 1K

Download Image

0 0 0 132 0

Dr. Noel Carrascal @LowKeyBiohacker

a year ago

NASA Discovers Third Global Energy Field – As Fundamental as Earth’s Gravity and Magnetic Fields scitechdaily.com/nasa-discovers…

0 0 1 35 0

Martin Bauer @martinmbauer

a year ago

It’s absolutely misguided to think that scientists using bloated, overly complicated language in their papers are somehow impressive to other scientists In reality the opposite is the case. It’s impressive if you can communicate complicated ideas in simple terms.

55 97 901 42K 40

Physics In History @PhysInHistory

a year ago

De Broglie wavelength for an electron, λ = ʰ⁄ₚ where, λ = wavelength h = Planck's constant (6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J.s) p = momentum

26 164 935 54K 96

Will Kinney @WKCosmo

a year ago

One of the strangest coincidences in physics is the fact that Newtonian fluid dynamics in three dimensions is exactly equivalent to a scalar field theory in FOUR dimensions, with a Lorentzian signature metric. I know of no intuitive reason for this to be true, but it is.

88 107 1K 199K 831

Mario Barbatti @MarioBarbatti

a year ago

I'm looking for recent (<10y) #compchem papers that predicted phenomena before any experiments. It's for a talk on this topic. Do you know any? Please send me the DOI.

33 28 113 29K 91

Niko McCarty. @NikoMcCarty

a year ago

This "frugal CRISPR kit" costs about $2. It includes a cell-free extract (no living cells), plasmids encoding colorful proteins, and Cas9 + guide RNAs. Students express colorful proteins in the extract & then use CRISPR to cut the protein-coding genes, leading to loss of color.